[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] integrity: add ima_counts_put (updated)

Mimi Zohar:
> This suggestion has been mentioned before; and yes would definitely
> resolve the annoying imbalance and iint_free() messages. But
> incrementing/decrementing the pointers automatically each time a file is
> opened/closed would defeat their purpose - alerting us that a file was
> possibly not measured before being read/executed.

I may be wrong since I don't fully understand IMA's purpose, but why did
you create ima_counts_get() and make it call after dentry_open() in
nfsd_open()? Isn't it same thing essentially?

J. R. Okajima

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-29 22:39    [W:0.045 / U:11.460 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site