[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: performance counter ~0.4% error finding retired instruction count
Ingo Molnar writes:

> I measured 2000, but generally a few thousand cycles per invocation
> sounds about right.

We could actually do a bit better than we do, fairly easily. We could
attach the counters to the child after the fork instead of the parent
before the fork, using a couple of pipes for synchronization. And
there's probably a way to get the dynamic linker to resolve the execvp
call early in the child so we avoid that overhead. I think we should
be able to get the overhead down to tens of userspace instructions
without doing anything unnatural.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-27 08:51    [W:0.124 / U:2.328 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site