[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
Date writes:

> hpa wrote:
> > However, as such it really should be paired with a "don't even recognize
> > the shortname if a longname exists" option.
> Right, we could just skip the 8.3 name matching and go straight to the
> longname match in fat_search_long(). I wonder if anyone ever relies on
> the 8.3 matching when a file has a long name on Linux?

Wine or such is using it.

> > It's also questionable IMO if this shouldn't be another FAT superdriver,
> > just as we have VFAT, MS-DOS etc. we could have "purevfat".
> It would be only a few lines of code difference between the two
> drivers - is it worth the maintainence overhead of splitting it up?
> Maybe a mount option to ignore 8.3 names for files with long names
> would be better? Perhaps even the default?

It sounds like to be start of yet another UMSDOS with minimal one. I
wouldn't like to repeat UMSDOS history, i.e. I think it needs real users
and developers. If not, I wouldn't like to add.

OGAWA Hirofumi <>

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-27 03:51    [W:0.113 / U:9.000 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site