lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] gitignore: add *.bz2 and *.cpio to top-level; clean up usr/
    From
    Date
    On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 00:46 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
    > On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 04:01:28AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
    > > On Sat, 2009-06-27 at 00:21 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
    > > > On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 01:02:27PM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
    > > > >
    > > > > On Sat, 2009-06-20 at 13:52 -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
    > > > > > Add *.bz2 and *.cpio to the top-level gitignore file, for consistency
    > > > > > with *.gz and *.lzma which are already there. Remove specific rules
    > > > > > in usr/gitignore, since they are now covered by the global rules.
    > > > > >
    > > > > > Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
    > > > > > Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
    > > > >
    > > > > It seems this is based on my patch :
    > > > >
    > > > > [PATCH] gitignore usr/initramfs_data.cpio.bz2 and usr/initramfs_data.cpio.lzma
    > > > >
    > > > > And you forget to CC me ;-)
    > > > >
    > > > > Are you trying to do this, fill signed-off-by and enjoy :
    > > > >
    > > > > [PATCH] Add *.bz2 and *.cpio to the top-level gitignore file, for consistency
    > > > > with *.gz and *.lzma which are already there. Remove specific rules
    > > > > in other gitignores, since they are now covered by the global rules.
    > > >
    > > > I would prefer to have *.gz and *.lzma pushed out to the
    > > > directories where it matters.
    > > > There global ignore rules will bite us one day.
    > > >
    > > > So I did not apply neither this nor Peter's original patch.
    > > >
    > >
    > > Ok and what about :
    > >
    > > [PATCH] gitignore usr/initramfs_data.cpio.bz2 and usr/initramfs_data.cpio.lzma
    >
    > You are far to trigger happy with your patches.
    > This is not a quest about getting maximum number of patches
    > applied.
    > This is about doing stuff in the right way and Peter had not even
    > replied when you start to push your patch.
    >
    > We have been there before and I'm getting tired of your
    > attitude towards your patch handling.
    >

    I am also tired of bz2 file coming up each and every time I prepare
    patch. I am curious because I want to get rid of it.

    I do not care whether you apply mine or peter or yours. I need solution.

    Thanks,
    --
    JSR



    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-27 00:55    [W:3.308 / U:0.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site