Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:33:16 -0500 | From | Larry Finger <> | Subject | Re: Regression with commit f9cde5f in 2.6.30-gitX |
| |
Yinghai Lu wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Yinghai Lu<yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Larry Finger<Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> wrote: >>> Yinghai Lu wrote: >>> node 0 link 0: mmio [a0000, bffff] >>> node 0 link 0: mmio [c0000000, dfffffff] >>> node 0 link 0: mmio [e0000000, efffffff] >>> node 0 link 0: mmio [f0000000, fe0bffff] >>> bus: [00,ff] on node 0 link 0 >>> bus: 00 index 0 io port: [0, ffff] >>> bus: 00 index 1 mmio: [a0000, bffff] >>> bus: 00 index 2 mmio: [c0000000, fcffffffff] >> that is read from pci config. >> >> and only one HT chain is there. so there is no point to use _CRS for them. >> >> please let me check if we could could have patch to deselect that. >> > > please try the attached patches. > > applying sequence: > fix_crs.patch > use_pci_crs_early.patch > > only_one.patch
From what I read in Linus's mails, it may be a moot point; however, my system boots with these 3, and only these 3, patches applied.
I didn't see any of the new printk's in the dmesg output.
Larry
| |