[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Regression with commit f9cde5f in 2.6.30-gitX
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > I was thinking 32 but 64 would be better if there aren't any
> > downsides elsewhere of making the array that big.
> Just chatting with Len about this; apparently the PNPACPI layer ran
> into something similar awhile back, and they had to go to a variable
> sized list of resources, due to weird machines with huge numbers of
> resources. Matthew says he's got an idea about how to fix this up; if
> that doesn't work out I'll see about making the bus resource array into
> a list instead.

Can we just bring the limit check back and increase the number for now
until folks come up with a better solution ?



 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-24 20:49    [W:0.052 / U:4.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site