[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Regression with commit f9cde5f in 2.6.30-gitX
    On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, Jesse Barnes wrote:
    > > I was thinking 32 but 64 would be better if there aren't any
    > > downsides elsewhere of making the array that big.
    > Just chatting with Len about this; apparently the PNPACPI layer ran
    > into something similar awhile back, and they had to go to a variable
    > sized list of resources, due to weird machines with huge numbers of
    > resources. Matthew says he's got an idea about how to fix this up; if
    > that doesn't work out I'll see about making the bus resource array into
    > a list instead.

    Can we just bring the limit check back and increase the number for now
    until folks come up with a better solution ?



     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-24 20:49    [W:0.031 / U:1.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site