[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] v5 RCU: the bloatwatch edition
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 05:58:32AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:32:08AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Paul, i guess this is .32 material anyway, right?
> I am personally OK with it being .32, as long as David Howells,
> Lennert Buytenhek, and Paul Mundt are OK with that schedule.
It's hard to see how this is going to cause any regressions, so I don't
see any problem with this going in to 2.6.31. OTOH, it's not too
pressing, so 2.6.32 is ok for me too.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-23 15:51    [W:0.055 / U:1.852 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site