lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC] pass write value to in_range pointers
On 06/23/2009 02:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:04:06AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote:
>
>>>> It will also need to support
>>>> multiple matches.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> What, signal many fds on the same address/value pair?
>>> I see this as a bug. Why is this a good thing to support?
>>> Just increases the chance of leaking this fd.
>>>
>>>
>> I believe Avi asked for this feature specifically, so I will defer to him.
>>
>
> Hmm. That's hard to implement in my model. Avi, can we give up
> this feature? I don't think anyone needs this specifically ...
>

I think we can make do with passing that single eventfd to multiple
consumers. It means their event count reads may return zero, but I
guess we can live with that.

I do want to retain flexibility in how we route events.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-23 13:59    [W:0.054 / U:1.996 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site