Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:56:23 +0300 | From | Avi Kivity <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] pass write value to in_range pointers |
| |
On 06/23/2009 02:44 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:04:06AM -0400, Gregory Haskins wrote: > >>>> It will also need to support >>>> multiple matches. >>>> >>>> >>> What, signal many fds on the same address/value pair? >>> I see this as a bug. Why is this a good thing to support? >>> Just increases the chance of leaking this fd. >>> >>> >> I believe Avi asked for this feature specifically, so I will defer to him. >> > > Hmm. That's hard to implement in my model. Avi, can we give up > this feature? I don't think anyone needs this specifically ... >
I think we can make do with passing that single eventfd to multiple consumers. It means their event count reads may return zero, but I guess we can live with that.
I do want to retain flexibility in how we route events.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
|  |