lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 3/3 -mmotm] oom: invoke oom killer for __GFP_NOFAIL
On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Nick Piggin wrote:

> > I would really prefer if we do as Andrew suggests. Both will fix this
> > problem, so I don't see it as a different topic at all.
>
> Well, his patch, as it stands, is a good one. Because we do have
> potential higher order GFP_NOFAIL.
>

There's currently an inconsistency in the definition of __GFP_NOFAIL and
its implementation. The clearly defined purpose of the flag is:

* __GFP_NOFAIL: The VM implementation _must_ retry infinitely: the caller
* cannot handle allocation failures.

Yet __GFP_NOFAIL allocations may fail if no progress is made via direct
reclaim and order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER. That's the behavior in the
git HEAD and Mel's allocator rework in mmotm.

I've been addressing this implicitly by requiring __GFP_NOFAIL to always
abide by the definition: we simply can never return NULL because the
caller can't handle it (and, by definition, shouldn't even be responsible
for considering it).

With my patch, we kill a memory hogging task that will free some memory so
the allocation will succeed (or multiple tasks if insufficient contiguous
memory is available). Kernel allocations use __GFP_NOFAIL, so the fault
of this memory freeing is entirely on the caller, not the page allocator.

My preference for handling this is to merge my patch (obviously :), and
then hopefully deprecate __GFP_NOFAIL as much as possible although I don't
suspect it could be eradicated forever.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-02 10:19    [W:0.079 / U:1.880 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site