[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/17] VFS: Implement handling for pathless pioctls
    On Jun 16, 2009  21:39 +0100, David Howells wrote:
    > Implement handling for pathless pioctls. Because these take no path argument,
    > there's no way to know for certain which filesystem they're aimed at, so we
    > have to switch on command number instead. This patch allows interested parties
    > to register handlers. Each registered handler function is tried in turn until
    > one doesn't return -EOPNOTSUPP.
    > This is required because OpenAFS implemented a number of AFS calls that don't
    > get given a path as they're aimed at AFS in general, and not at a particular
    > file, volume or cell in the AFS world.

    Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to create a virtual device, open the
    mountpoint, or do _something_ that associates these calls with AFS
    directly instead of having the kernel magically route the call to a
    specific filesystem?

    Not that I agree with having a filesystem-specific syscall either
    (sys_reiserfs() was not allowed either :-), but wouldn't even that
    be better suited to doing AFS-specific things?

    Cheers, Andreas
    Andreas Dilger
    Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
    Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-17 09:51    [W:0.021 / U:86.864 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site