lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRE: Xen vs. KVM
    From
    > 2009/6/15 <jmerkey@wolfmountaingroup.com>
    >
    >> I have worked with both KVM and XEN and to be honest, XEN is infested
    >> with
    >> bugs -- mostly of the paging type -- and you need an logic analyzer of
    >> an
    >> ICE to debug some of it. I have nothing but trouble with it. KVM is
    >> more
    >> stable but also sucks on performance, but I occasionally see the same
    >> issues.
    >
    > This is bullshit.
    >
    > KVM is buggy und very unstable. It´s NOT RECOMMENDED for production usage.
    >
    > Xen is fully developed, fast and more reliable than KVM.
    > Thousands of companies are using Xen or Citrix XenServer and its super
    > fast, easy to use and 100% rockstable!
    > The XEN PV Guest drivers are excellent in comparison with the KVM windows
    > guest drivers. (after installing the 64 bit networking drivers with Server
    > 2008 x64 > blue screen...).. I hate kvm.
    >
    > @ Linus : Please merge xen as hypervisor into linux, right now !
    >
    > -
    >
    > Morten
    >

    They are both buggy. but Xen is BUGGIER.

    Before you call bullshit try eating your own dogfood. I threw both of
    these pieces of shit away in the trash and went back to VMWare, which is
    slower than crap, but it least it fucking works.

    Jeff



    --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-18 05:09    [W:0.022 / U:59.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site