[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: Xen vs. KVM
> 2009/6/15 <>
>> I have worked with both KVM and XEN and to be honest, XEN is infested
>> with
>> bugs -- mostly of the paging type -- and you need an logic analyzer of
>> an
>> ICE to debug some of it. I have nothing but trouble with it. KVM is
>> more
>> stable but also sucks on performance, but I occasionally see the same
>> issues.
> This is bullshit.
> KVM is buggy und very unstable. It´s NOT RECOMMENDED for production usage.
> Xen is fully developed, fast and more reliable than KVM.
> Thousands of companies are using Xen or Citrix XenServer and its super
> fast, easy to use and 100% rockstable!
> The XEN PV Guest drivers are excellent in comparison with the KVM windows
> guest drivers. (after installing the 64 bit networking drivers with Server
> 2008 x64 > blue screen...).. I hate kvm.
> @ Linus : Please merge xen as hypervisor into linux, right now !
> -
> Morten

They are both buggy. but Xen is BUGGIER.

Before you call bullshit try eating your own dogfood. I threw both of
these pieces of shit away in the trash and went back to VMWare, which is
slower than crap, but it least it fucking works.


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-18 05:09    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean