lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT]: Networking
Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> David Miller a écrit :
>> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 12:11:32 +0200
>>
>>> sure, here you go (i also added a stack dump, just in case it's some
>>> kernel-internal socket open):
>>>
>>> [ifconfig:3516]: Creates X25 socket.
>>>
>>> so plain ifconfig. Part of the ~1.5 years old net-tools-1.60-84.fc8.
>> Ok, ifconfig seems to open one of every socket type when it starts up.
>> That explains why an X25 socket is openned and then closed.
>>
>> Now the question is why is the X25 socket released by a timer? This
>> should only happen if some socket memory is still pending in the
>> socket buffers.
>>
>> Wait, I know why this is triggering now. It's Eric Dumazet's SKB
>> accounting optimizations.
>>
>> So, I'll fix the X25 timer bug. It's always been there, but
>> beforehand this deferred-via-timer x25 socket destruction path almost
>> never triggers. So we never saw it. Now it happens every time.
>>
>> Eric can you sniff around and see what you think about this unforseen
>> (at least for me) consequence of your changes? Socket layers that use
>> the current sk_wmem_alloc/sk_rmem_alloc value at destroy time to
>> determine if a socket can be killed immediately, or need to be killed
>> later via timer, will always see that dummy one byte allocation you
>> now put there.
>>
>> Can you look into that?
>>
>> Thanks.
>
>
> Sure I can look if a layer uses sk_wmem_alloc as you describe.
>
> (I take you refer to commit 2b85a34e911bf483c27cfdd124aeb1605145dc80 :
> net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx)
>
> So there is no impact for sk_rmem_alloc AFAIK
>

Here is first patch to take into account this initial offset in sk_wmem_alloc

(Only compiled, not tested)

A second patch will follow to correct /prov/net/udp and other PROC_FS files, and
also SIOCOUTQ/TIOCOUTQ, as we currently give off-by-one values, it certainly can
break some apps.

Thank you

[PATCH] net: sk_wmem_alloc has initial value of one, not zero

commit 2b85a34e911bf483c27cfdd124aeb1605145dc80
(net: No more expensive sock_hold()/sock_put() on each tx)
changed initial sk_wmem_alloc value.

Some protocols check sk_wmem_alloc value to determine if a timer
must delay socket deallocation. We must take care of the sk_wmem_alloc
value being one instead of zero.

Reported by Ingo Molnar, and full diagnostic from David Miller.

Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
---
net/appletalk/ddp.c | 4 ++--
net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 2 +-
net/econet/af_econet.c | 4 ++--
net/netrom/af_netrom.c | 2 +-
net/rose/af_rose.c | 2 +-
net/x25/af_x25.c | 2 +-
6 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/appletalk/ddp.c b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
index b603cba..048cfd0 100644
--- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c
+++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ static void atalk_destroy_timer(unsigned long data)
{
struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)data;

- if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) ||
+ if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) > 1 ||
atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) {
sk->sk_timer.expires = jiffies + SOCK_DESTROY_TIME;
add_timer(&sk->sk_timer);
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ static inline void atalk_destroy_socket(struct sock *sk)
atalk_remove_socket(sk);
skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);

- if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) ||
+ if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) > 1 ||
atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) {
setup_timer(&sk->sk_timer, atalk_destroy_timer,
(unsigned long)sk);
diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
index fd9d06f..2e81b1d 100644
--- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
+++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ void ax25_destroy_socket(ax25_cb *ax25)
}

if (ax25->sk != NULL) {
- if (atomic_read(&ax25->sk->sk_wmem_alloc) ||
+ if (atomic_read(&ax25->sk->sk_wmem_alloc) > 1 ||
atomic_read(&ax25->sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) {
/* Defer: outstanding buffers */
setup_timer(&ax25->dtimer, ax25_destroy_timer,
diff --git a/net/econet/af_econet.c b/net/econet/af_econet.c
index 8121bf0..051dcb6 100644
--- a/net/econet/af_econet.c
+++ b/net/econet/af_econet.c
@@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static void econet_destroy_timer(unsigned long data)
{
struct sock *sk=(struct sock *)data;

- if (!atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) &&
+ if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) <= 1 &&
!atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) {
sk_free(sk);
return;
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ static int econet_release(struct socket *sock)
skb_queue_purge(&sk->sk_receive_queue);

if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc) ||
- atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc)) {
+ atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) > 1) {
sk->sk_timer.data = (unsigned long)sk;
sk->sk_timer.expires = jiffies + HZ;
sk->sk_timer.function = econet_destroy_timer;
diff --git a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
index 3be0e01..8126bd4 100644
--- a/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
+++ b/net/netrom/af_netrom.c
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ void nr_destroy_socket(struct sock *sk)
kfree_skb(skb);
}

- if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) ||
+ if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) > 1 ||
atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) {
/* Defer: outstanding buffers */
sk->sk_timer.function = nr_destroy_timer;
diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c
index 877a7f6..0ab0f4d 100644
--- a/net/rose/af_rose.c
+++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c
@@ -356,7 +356,7 @@ void rose_destroy_socket(struct sock *sk)
kfree_skb(skb);
}

- if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) ||
+ if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) > 1 ||
atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) {
/* Defer: outstanding buffers */
setup_timer(&sk->sk_timer, rose_destroy_timer,
diff --git a/net/x25/af_x25.c b/net/x25/af_x25.c
index c51f309..57dd5d3 100644
--- a/net/x25/af_x25.c
+++ b/net/x25/af_x25.c
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static void __x25_destroy_socket(struct sock *sk)
kfree_skb(skb);
}

- if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) ||
+ if (atomic_read(&sk->sk_wmem_alloc) > 1 ||
atomic_read(&sk->sk_rmem_alloc)) {
/* Defer: outstanding buffers */
sk->sk_timer.expires = jiffies + 10 * HZ;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-16 16:23    [W:0.074 / U:1.828 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site