[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] lib: Provide generic atomic64_t implementation
Avi Kivity writes:

> An alternative implementation using 64-bit cmpxchg will recover most of
> the costs of hashed spinlocks. I assume most serious 32-bit
> architectures have them?

Have a 64-bit cmpxchg, you mean? x86 is the only one I know of, and
it already has an atomic64_t implementation using cmpxchg8b (or
whatever it's called).

My thinking is that the 32-bit non-x86 architectures will be mostly
UP, so the overhead is just an interrupt enable/restore. Those that
are SMP I would expect to be small SMP -- mostly just 2 cpus and maybe
a few 4-way systems.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-14 14:23    [W:0.098 / U:5.052 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site