[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] lib: Provide generic atomic64_t implementation
    Avi Kivity writes:

    > An alternative implementation using 64-bit cmpxchg will recover most of
    > the costs of hashed spinlocks. I assume most serious 32-bit
    > architectures have them?

    Have a 64-bit cmpxchg, you mean? x86 is the only one I know of, and
    it already has an atomic64_t implementation using cmpxchg8b (or
    whatever it's called).

    My thinking is that the 32-bit non-x86 architectures will be mostly
    UP, so the overhead is just an interrupt enable/restore. Those that
    are SMP I would expect to be small SMP -- mostly just 2 cpus and maybe
    a few 4-way systems.


     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-14 14:23    [W:0.029 / U:3.612 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site