Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 13 Jun 2009 14:08:08 -0400 (EDT) | From | Alan Stern <> | Subject | Re: [patch update] Re: [linux-pm] Run-time PM idea (was: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] PM: Rearrange core suspend code) |
| |
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> So, the conclusion seems to be that we should break the recurrence > at the point we find an already active device or a device with no parent and > let the driver(s) handle the more complicated cases. Is this correct?
That's right.
> BTW, is __device_release_driver() the right place for blocking the run-time PM > temporarily during remove?
It is. And for submitting a delayed autosuspend request afterward; we may as well try to suspend devices that don't have drivers.
Alan Stern
| |