lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch update] Re: [linux-pm] Run-time PM idea (was: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] PM: Rearrange core suspend code)
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> So, the conclusion seems to be that we should break the recurrence
> at the point we find an already active device or a device with no parent and
> let the driver(s) handle the more complicated cases. Is this correct?

That's right.

> BTW, is __device_release_driver() the right place for blocking the run-time PM
> temporarily during remove?

It is. And for submitting a delayed autosuspend request afterward; we
may as well try to suspend devices that don't have drivers.

Alan Stern



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-13 20:11    [W:0.077 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site