[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: linux-next: origin tree build failure
    On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 19:33 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
    > We should at least -try- to follow the
    > process we've defined, don't you think ?

    So you're saying -next should include whole new subsystems even though
    its not clear they will be merged?

    That'll invariably create the opposite case where a tree doesn't get
    pulled and breaks bits due to its absence.

    -next does a great job of sorting the existing subsystem trees, but I
    don't think its Stephens job to decide if things will get merged.

    Therefore when things are in limbo (there was no definite ACK from Linus
    on perf counters) both inclusion and exclusion from -next can lead to

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-12 11:47    [W:0.019 / U:26.876 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site