lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: sound skipping regression introduced in 2.6.30-rc8
Date
On Thursday 11 June 2009 16:23:04 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:14:07 +0200,
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >
> > On Thursday 11 June 2009 15:56:14 Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > At Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:32:33 +0200,
> > > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday 11 June 2009 14:02:20 David Miller wrote:
> > > > > From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> > > > > Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 21:37:14 +0200
> > > > >
> > > > > > Also, it'd be helpful if you can check whether the problem exists in
> > > > > > the current sound git tree (for-linus branch), too.
> > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound-2.6.git for-linus
> > > > >
> > > > > Same behavior as 2.6.30, but debugging messages are formatted differently
> > > > > :-)
> > > > >
> > > > > [ 1109.062182] PCM: Lost interrupts? (stream=0, delta=16384, intr_ptr=73728)
> > > > > [ 1125.126123] PCM: Lost interrupts? (stream=0, delta=16384, intr_ptr=861184)
> > > > > [ 1131.398094] PCM: Lost interrupts? (stream=0, delta=16384, intr_ptr=1178624)
> > > > > [ 1135.579406] PCM: Lost interrupts? (stream=0, delta=16384, intr_ptr=1395712)
> > > > > [ 1145.115367] PCM: Lost interrupts? (stream=0, delta=16384, intr_ptr=1869824)
> > > > > [ 1152.688670] PCM: Lost interrupts? (stream=0, delta=16384, intr_ptr=2249728)
> > > >
> > > > [ Just another data point. ]
> > > >
> > > > I'm experiencing similar problem with the sound in recent -next kernels.
> > >
> > > Which driver?
> >
> > snd_intel8x0
> >
> > > > Though the only debug data that I'm getting with xrun_debug == 1 is:
> > > >
> > > > XRUN: pcmC0D0p:0
> > > > XRUN: pcmC0D0p:0
> > > > XRUN: pcmC0D0p:0
> > > > XRUN: pcmC0D0p:0
> > > > XRUN: pcmC0D0p:0
> > > >
> > > > with xrun_debug == 3:
> > > > XRUN: pcmC0D0p:0
> > > > Pid: 4718, comm: audacious Not tainted 2.6.30-next-20090611-07944-gc1b019d-dirty #21
> > > > Call Trace:
> > >
> > > The semantics of xrun_debug proc file was a bit changed. Now it's
> > > bit flags, and 4 corresponds to the additional jiffies check (1 is to
> > > show the debug message, 2 to show stack trace).
> > >
> > > Try to set 5 to xrun_debug. Do you get other messages?
> >
> > With xrun_debug == 5 I get:
> >
> > PCM: hw_ptr skipping! (pos=14336, delta=15893, period=1024, jdelta=3/90)
> > PCM: hw_ptr skipping! (pos=11264, delta=15893, period=1024, jdelta=3/90)
> > PCM: hw_ptr skipping! (pos=7168, delta=15888, period=1024, jdelta=3/90)
> > PCM: hw_ptr skipping! (pos=8192, delta=15915, period=1024, jdelta=3/90)
> > PCM: hw_ptr skipping! (pos=15360, delta=15888, period=1024, jdelta=3/90)
> > XRUN: pcmC0D0p:0
> > PCM: hw_ptr skipping! (pos=6144, delta=15890, period=1024, jdelta=3/90)
> > PCM: hw_ptr skipping! (pos=3072, delta=15890, period=1024, jdelta=3/90)
> >
> > [ They seem to be the same as reported by davem against 2.6.30. ]
>
> Yes.
>
> > and the skipping is gone.
>
> Does the patch below fix the problem?

Unfortunately, it did not fix the issue.

> If not, how about to revert the commit below?
>
> commit da2436a23c038055b1da6fe30b6ea2886b1e07b0
> Author: Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>
> Date: Mon Apr 13 21:31:25 2009 +0200
> [ALSA] intel8x0: do not use zero value from PICB register

Same here.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-11 17:37    [W:0.114 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site