[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: document basic ftracer/ftracer graph needs
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 13:04, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> While implementing ftracer and ftracer graph support, I found the exact
>> arch implementation details to be a bit lacking (and my x86 foo ain't
>> great).  So after pounding out support for the Blackfin arch, document
>> the requirements.
> This does not belong in the Kconfig. That's the last place a developer
> will look for implementing something.

yes and no -- i was following the existing documenting practice of
ftrace where details were added to the Kconfig. guess i should fix
that in the process.

there should be at least tips in each HAVE_XXX as to where to look for
implementation details.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-10 20:43    [W:0.140 / U:24.760 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site