[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] ftrace: document basic ftracer/ftracer graph needs
    On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 13:04, Steven Rostedt wrote:
    > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009, Mike Frysinger wrote:
    >> While implementing ftracer and ftracer graph support, I found the exact
    >> arch implementation details to be a bit lacking (and my x86 foo ain't
    >> great).  So after pounding out support for the Blackfin arch, document
    >> the requirements.
    > This does not belong in the Kconfig. That's the last place a developer
    > will look for implementing something.

    yes and no -- i was following the existing documenting practice of
    ftrace where details were added to the Kconfig. guess i should fix
    that in the process.

    there should be at least tips in each HAVE_XXX as to where to look for
    implementation details.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-06-10 20:43    [W:0.019 / U:1.552 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site