Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 10 Jun 2009 19:33:12 +0200 | From | Martin Schwidefsky <> | Subject | Re: [patch 0/2] NOHZ vs. profile/oprofile v2 |
| |
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009 22:52:51 +0200 (CEST) Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > > Greetings, > > version 2 of the profile patches. The only change is the in_interrupt() > > fix in tick_nohz_stop_idle(). I would like to know how to proceed with > > the issue. > > Andy, do you still prefer to handle the old style profiler analog to > > the oprofile patch? If yes I would drop patch #1 and extend patch #2 > > with another tick_nohz_disable(). > > Any update on this one ?
I haven't heard anything from any Andy in regard to patch #1. We could do patch #2 now and decide later what we want to do with the old style profiler.
blue skies, Martin.
| |