Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 2 Jun 2009 02:14:24 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: PATCH? tracehook_report_clone: fix false positives |
| |
On 06/01, Roland McGrath wrote: > > This is where the utrace attachment point has to be (i.e. outside all the > locking).
Yes I see. Quoting myself:
Yes, utrace-ptrace will likely change this code further anyway and move the code from _init() to _report_clone() back, but in this case I guess the whole tracehook_finish_clone() will go away, so this change looks right anyway to me.
> So I don't see any benefit to changing the ptrace status quo now > for its own sake.
OK, agreed.
Oleg.
| |