lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: PATCH? tracehook_report_clone: fix false positives
On 06/01, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> This is where the utrace attachment point has to be (i.e. outside all the
> locking).

Yes I see. Quoting myself:

Yes, utrace-ptrace will likely change this code further anyway
and move the code from _init() to _report_clone() back, but in this case
I guess the whole tracehook_finish_clone() will go away, so this change
looks right anyway to me.

> So I don't see any benefit to changing the ptrace status quo now
> for its own sake.

OK, agreed.

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-02 02:21    [W:0.042 / U:0.480 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site