[lkml]   [2009]   [Jun]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/4] partitions/ide: improve Host Protected Area handling
On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:59:29 -0400
Greg Freemyer <> wrote:

> Alan, given your emphatic ack, is libata likely to follow the same
> model. Any chance we could have a single boot param that handled both

If the patches get in then it makes no sense not to implement them
identically in libata.

> drivers? I mean instead of having 2 module params.

No because the modules have different names so it will always be
ide_core.something and libata.something

Bartlomiej - thinking about this I question "nohpa=" because we get into
unneccessary negatives ide_core.hpa= is one less inversion to figure out.

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-06-01 15:09    [W:0.155 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site