[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86-64: fix build with older binutils
    Jan Beulich wrote:
    > Yeah, the placement of .init.start appears to be wrong - it should the
    > SMP/x86-64 case of the per-CPU segment, and it should also be the
    > one getting the :init attached. Hopefully that won't get us back to the
    > binutils problem I was originally encountering - what is the extra .init.start
    > section good for anyway? And why does __init_end continue to live
    > outside of any section (this sort of thing causes problems with
    > CONFIG_RELOCATABLE and older binutils afair, as such symbols get
    > marked absolute by the latter)? While this was the case (and a mistake)
    > for x86-64 prior to the merge, it was properly placed in a section for
    > ix86, and hence I'd view it as a regression there.
    > Btw., why is .data.nosave being placed differently for 32- and 64-bit?

    Probably for no good reason, but it might need additional fixes.


    H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
    I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

     \ /
      Last update: 2009-05-08 06:43    [W:0.019 / U:38.692 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site