lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH] genirq: ensure IRQs are lazy disabled before suspend
Date
In commit 76d2160147f43f982dfe881404cfde9fd0a9da21, the default
behavior of disable_irq() was changed to delay the disable until it is
next handled.

However, this leaves open the possibility that the system can go into
suspend with an interrupt enabled. For example, if a driver calls
disable_irq() in its suspend_hook (for example, to prevent that device
IRQ from causing a system wakeup) there's now a possibility that the
system is suspended before the lazy disable happens.

The result is an unwanted wakeup from suspend if the IRQ is capable of
waking the system (common on embedded SoCs.)

This patch ensures that the lazy disable is done, and masked by
the irq_chip before the system goes into suspend.

Note that even though __disable_irq() also calls irq_chip->disable, it
is quite common for the irq_chip not to provide a disable hook in
which case the IRQ is never masked/disabled in hardware before going
into suspend.

Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
---
kernel/irq/manage.c | 5 +++++
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index 2734eca..5d2cc1c 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -190,6 +190,11 @@ void __disable_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int irq, bool suspend)
if (!desc->action || (desc->action->flags & IRQF_TIMER))
return;
desc->status |= IRQ_SUSPENDED;
+
+ /* Lazy disable: handles case where lazy disable in
+ * handler doesn't happen before suspend. */
+ if (desc->status & IRQ_DISABLED)
+ desc->chip->mask(irq);
}

if (!desc->depth++) {
--
1.6.2.2


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-07 02:21    [W:0.032 / U:0.568 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site