Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] v4 RCU: the bloatwatch edition | Date | Wed, 06 May 2009 23:22:54 +0100 |
| |
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> More like "concerns". It's unobvious to me that the modest .text > savings justify the costs of an additional RCU implementation. Where > those costs include
It may be more than just modest .text savings. Being optimised to be as simple as possible, and to only support one CPU, it may be quicker too. I'm not sure how best to benchmark it though.
David
| |