lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[patch 41/58] check_unsafe_exec() doesnt care about signal handlers sharing
2.6.29-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

commit f1191b50ec11c8e2ca766d6d99eb5bb9d2c084a3 upstream.

... since we'll unshare sighand anyway

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
fs/exec.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1053,23 +1053,20 @@ int check_unsafe_exec(struct linux_binpr
{
struct task_struct *p = current, *t;
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned n_fs, n_sighand;
+ unsigned n_fs;
int res = 0;

bprm->unsafe = tracehook_unsafe_exec(p);

n_fs = 1;
- n_sighand = 1;
write_lock(&p->fs->lock);
lock_task_sighand(p, &flags);
for (t = next_thread(p); t != p; t = next_thread(t)) {
if (t->fs == p->fs)
n_fs++;
- n_sighand++;
}

- if (p->fs->users > n_fs ||
- atomic_read(&p->sighand->count) > n_sighand) {
+ if (p->fs->users > n_fs) {
bprm->unsafe |= LSM_UNSAFE_SHARE;
} else {
if (p->fs->in_exec)



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-07 00:15    [W:0.228 / U:12.748 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site