[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/6] ksm: change the KSM_REMOVE_MEMORY_REGION ioctl.
On Wed, 6 May 2009, Chris Wright wrote:
> There's already locking issues w/ using madvise and ksm, so yes,
> changes would need to be made. Some question of how (whether) to handle
> registration of unmapped ranges, closest to say ->mm->def_flags=VM_MERGE.
> My hunch is there's 2 cases users might care about, a specific range
> (qemu-kvm, CERN app, etc) or the entire vma space of a process.

Good food for thought there, but not on my mind at this moment.

> Another
> question of what to do w/ VM_LOCKED, should that exclude VM_MERGE or
> let user get what asked for?

What's the issue with VM_LOCKED? We wouldn't want to merge a page
while it was under get_user_pages (unless KSM's own, but ignore that),
but what's the deal with VM_LOCKED?

Is the phrase "covert channel" going to come up somehow?


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-06 18:57    [W:0.111 / U:0.836 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site