Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 6 May 2009 06:56:13 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] ptrace: ptrace_attach: check PF_KTHREAD + exit_state instead of ->mm |
| |
On 05/05, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > I now have: > > > > # > > # ptrace > > # > > ptrace-remove-pt_dtrace-from-arch-h8300.patch > > ptrace-remove-pt_dtrace-from-avr32-mn10300-parisc-s390-sh-xtensa.patch > > ptrace-remove-pt_dtrace-from-m68k-m68knommu.patch > > ptrace-remove-pt_dtrace-from-arch-m32r.patch > > ptrace-mm_need_new_owner-use-real_parent-to-search-in-the-siblings.patch > > ptrace-tracehook_unsafe_exec-remove-the-stale-comment.patch > > ptrace-tracehook_unsafe_exec-remove-the-stale-comment-fix.patch > > ptrace-do-not-use-task-ptrace-directly-in-core-kernel.patch > > # > > # utrace > > # > > signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch > > utrace-core.patch > > utrace-core-kill-exclude_xtrace-logic.patch > > I'd swap these three to be after ... > > > # > > ptrace-ptrace_attach-check-pf_kthread-exit_state-instead-of-mm.patch > > ptrace-cleanup-check-set-of-pt_ptraced-during-attach.patch > > ptrace-do-not-use-task_lock-for-attach.patch > > ptrace_get_task_struct-s-tasklist-rcu-make-it-static.patch
Yes, that was the plan.
But, to do this, utrace-core-kill-exclude_xtrace-logic.patch should be folded into utrace-core.patch. Otherwise, utrace-core.patch alone can't be applied after this new series.
Oleg.
| |