lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: IO scheduler based IO Controller V2
On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 09:11:18AM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> [2009-05-05 13:24:41]:
>
> > On Tue, 5 May 2009 15:58:27 -0400
> > Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > Here is the V2 of the IO controller patches generated on top of 2.6.30-rc4.
> > > ...
> > > Currently primarily two other IO controller proposals are out there.
> > >
> > > dm-ioband
> > > ---------
> > > This patch set is from Ryo Tsuruta from valinux.
> > > ...
> > > IO-throttling
> > > -------------
> > > This patch set is from Andrea Righi provides max bandwidth controller.
> >
> > I'm thinking we need to lock you guys in a room and come back in 15 minutes.
> >
> > Seriously, how are we to resolve this? We could lock me in a room and
> > cmoe back in 15 days, but there's no reason to believe that I'd emerge
> > with the best answer.
> >
>
> We are planning an IO mini-summit prior to the kernel summit
> (hopefully we'll all be able to attend and decide).

Hi Balbir,

Mini summit is still few months away. I think a better idea would be to
try to thrash out the details here on lkml and try to reach to some
conclusion.

Its a complicated problem and there are no simple and easy answers. If we
can't reach a conclusion here, I am skeptical that mini summit will serve
that purpose.

Thanks
Vivek


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-06 15:33    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans