Messages in this thread | | | From | Roland McGrath <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] ptrace: ptrace_attach: check PF_KTHREAD + exit_state instead of ->mm | Date | Tue, 5 May 2009 19:06:17 -0700 (PDT) |
| |
> I now have: > > # > # ptrace > # > ptrace-remove-pt_dtrace-from-arch-h8300.patch > ptrace-remove-pt_dtrace-from-avr32-mn10300-parisc-s390-sh-xtensa.patch > ptrace-remove-pt_dtrace-from-m68k-m68knommu.patch > ptrace-remove-pt_dtrace-from-arch-m32r.patch > ptrace-mm_need_new_owner-use-real_parent-to-search-in-the-siblings.patch > ptrace-tracehook_unsafe_exec-remove-the-stale-comment.patch > ptrace-tracehook_unsafe_exec-remove-the-stale-comment-fix.patch > ptrace-do-not-use-task-ptrace-directly-in-core-kernel.patch > # > # utrace > # > signals-tracehook_notify_jctl-change.patch > utrace-core.patch > utrace-core-kill-exclude_xtrace-logic.patch
I'd swap these three to be after ...
> # > ptrace-ptrace_attach-check-pf_kthread-exit_state-instead-of-mm.patch > ptrace-cleanup-check-set-of-pt_ptraced-during-attach.patch > ptrace-do-not-use-task_lock-for-attach.patch > ptrace_get_task_struct-s-tasklist-rcu-make-it-static.patch
... all these. Some more ptrace patches will come in and can also go after these ptrace* ones but before the "utrace three". When we get there we'll replace those three including utrace with probably two (a revamp of the tracehook change plus a single refreshed utrace.patch).
Thanks, Roland
| |