lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: introducing __GFP_PANIC
From
Date
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 14:11 +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> I believe this version should be correct (still RFC).
> __GFP_NOWARN has printk limit so instead of making
> additional checks (while combining those prink in
> original code) just adding panic with order and flags
> should be cleaner (as it done at moment :)

Looks good to me!

Reviewed-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>

I suspect the patch needs some additional work for -mm due to Mel
Gorman's page allocator cleanup and optimization patches.

Pekka



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-04 12:35    [W:3.880 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site