Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 31 May 2009 15:16:55 +0300 | Subject | Re: [patch 0/5] Support for sanitization flag in low-level page allocator | From | Pekka Enberg <> |
| |
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Larry H. <research@subreption.com> wrote: > Thanks for coming to the conclusion that unconditional memory > sanitization is the correct approach. > > I thought this had been stated numerous times before in this thread. Are > you serious about your responses or you are just clowning around? It's > amusing, I give you that much.
So is this the same Larry that was able to have a productive and civil discussion on #mm on IRC where he wanted me to ACK his patches? Or did his evil identical twin take over the keyboard?
But anyway, enough is enough, and I really am not interested in this discussion. I wish you the best of luck getting your patches merged. I suspect you're gonna need it.
Pekka
| |