Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Sun, 31 May 2009 14:15:41 +0300 | | From | Alon Ziv <> | | Subject | Preferred kernel API/ABI for accelerator hardware device driver |
| |
Hi
I am looking for advice on the proper design of an API for a device driver for hardware acceleration (e.g. a JPEG decoder or a cryptographic function accelerator). These hardware modules don’t appear to map properly to the standard device-driver paradigm (i.e., a “device file” that communicates with userspace using read()/write() system calls), as we need to pass input data into the kernel and receive transformed output directly. The only way I see to use standard IO operations on such drivers is by copying the data into temporary kernel buffers, which is (a) a pain and (b) horribly inefficient.
Currently the only way I see around this limitation is to implement all communications with such a driver using ioctl() operations, but this isn’t a very satisfactory solution—for example, it does not provide a way to do something similar to “writev()” (gathering several buffers for a single processing operation).
Should I just take the plunge and implement a new “iov(fd, iov_in, iovcnt_in, iov_out, iovcnt_out)” system call? Does anyone have a better idea for an interface that will allow zero-copy interfacing to a transformation driver from userspace?
-az
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |