Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Xen is a feature | From | Jaswinder Singh Rajput <> | Date | Fri, 29 May 2009 12:07:32 +0530 |
| |
Hi Dave,
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 21:05 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:45:34 -0700 > > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > >> Xen changes - especially dom0 - are overwhelmingly not about improving > >> Linux, but about having some special hook and extra treatment in > >> random places - and that's really bad. > >> > > > > You've made this argument a few times now, and I take exception to it. > > > > It seems to be predicated on the idea that Xen has some kind of niche > > usage, with barely more users than Voyager. Or that it is a parasite > > sitting on the side of Linux, being a pure drain. > > I don't see Ingo's comments, whether I agree with them or not, as > an implication of Xen being niche. Rather I see his comments as > an opposition to how Xen is implemented. >
You can see Ingo's comments and whole thread under subject :
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] Xen APIC hooks (with io_apic_ops)
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/27/758
-- JSR
| |