Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 May 2009 19:07:43 +0200 | From | Jens Axboe <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/11] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v9 |
| |
On Fri, May 29 2009, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: >>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c >>> index 2349e2c..d1ac967 100644 >>> --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c >>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c >>> @@ -1929,6 +1929,9 @@ static int ubifs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) >>> err = bdi_init(&c->bdi); >>> if (err) >>> goto out_close; >>> + err = bdi_register(&c->bdi, NULL, "ubifs"); >>> + if (err) >>> + goto out_close; >> >> Not quite right, you need to call bdi_destroy() if you have done the >> init. > > Right, bdi_destroy() is already there for long time. > I'm confused. > >> I committed this one this morning: >> >> http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=570a2fe1df85741988ad0ca22aa406744436e281 > > Hmm, it is the same as my patch, but you do > + err = bdi_register(&c->bdi); > while I do > + err = bdi_register(&c->bdi, NULL, "ubifs");
Oops, that's my bad. If you combine the two, we should have a working patch :-)
>> But feel free to commit/submit to the ubifs tree directly, then it'll >> disappear from my tree once it is merged. > > Yeah, I think it can go via my tree. I'd merge it at > 2.6.31 window. This change does not depend on your > work anyway.
Right, I'll just carry the fixup patches meanwhile as well, but wont upstream them.
-- Jens Axboe
| |