lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads v9
On Fri, May 29 2009, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
>>> index 2349e2c..d1ac967 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c
>>> @@ -1929,6 +1929,9 @@ static int ubifs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
>>> err = bdi_init(&c->bdi);
>>> if (err)
>>> goto out_close;
>>> + err = bdi_register(&c->bdi, NULL, "ubifs");
>>> + if (err)
>>> + goto out_close;
>>
>> Not quite right, you need to call bdi_destroy() if you have done the
>> init.
>
> Right, bdi_destroy() is already there for long time.
> I'm confused.
>
>> I committed this one this morning:
>>
>> http://git.kernel.dk/?p=linux-2.6-block.git;a=commit;h=570a2fe1df85741988ad0ca22aa406744436e281
>
> Hmm, it is the same as my patch, but you do
> + err = bdi_register(&c->bdi);
> while I do
> + err = bdi_register(&c->bdi, NULL, "ubifs");

Oops, that's my bad. If you combine the two, we should have a working
patch :-)

>> But feel free to commit/submit to the ubifs tree directly, then it'll
>> disappear from my tree once it is merged.
>
> Yeah, I think it can go via my tree. I'd merge it at
> 2.6.31 window. This change does not depend on your
> work anyway.

Right, I'll just carry the fixup patches meanwhile as well, but wont
upstream them.

--
Jens Axboe



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-29 19:11    [W:0.081 / U:3.848 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site