lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] tracing/events: Rename worklet_execute to worklet_entry and worklet_complete to worklet_exit
From
Hi Anton, Zhaolei,

You tracing/workqueues patches look good and I've tested them succesfully.
I will apply them soon, thanks!

2009/5/26 Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>:
>
> Keep a common naming convention for tracing the latency of events such as
> softirq_entry/softirq_exit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
> ---
>
> What do people think? It seems like a good idea to have a naming convention
> when tracing event latency for softirqs, timers, worklets, etc.
>
> Index: linux-2.6-master/include/trace/events/workqueue.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-master.orig/include/trace/events/workqueue.h      2009-05-26 12:40:01.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6-master/include/trace/events/workqueue.h   2009-05-26 12:40:16.000000000 +1000
> @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
>                __entry->cpu, __entry->delay)
>  );
>
> -TRACE_EVENT(worklet_execute,
> +TRACE_EVENT(worklet_entry,
>
>        TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *wq_thread, struct work_struct *work),
>
> @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
>  );
>
>  /* Declare work as void *, because we can't use work->... in after f(work) */
> -TRACE_EVENT(worklet_complete,
> +TRACE_EVENT(worklet_exit,
>        TP_PROTO(struct task_struct *wq_thread, void *work),
>
>        TP_ARGS(wq_thread, work),
> Index: linux-2.6-master/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-master.orig/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c        2009-05-26 12:43:27.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6-master/kernel/trace/trace_workqueue.c     2009-05-26 12:43:36.000000000 +1000
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
>
>        /*
>         * save latest work_struct's pointer to use as identifier in
> -        * probe_worklet_complete, because we can't use work_struct->...
> +        * probe_worklet_exit, because we can't use work_struct->...
>         * after worklet got executed
>         */
>        void                            *work;
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
>
>  /* Execution of a work */
>  static void
> -probe_worklet_execute(struct task_struct *wq_thread, struct work_struct *work)
> +probe_worklet_entry(struct task_struct *wq_thread, struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>        int cpu = cpumask_first(&wq_thread->cpus_allowed);
>        struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node;
> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
>
>  /* Complete of a work */
>  static void
> -probe_worklet_complete(struct task_struct *wq_thread, void *work)
> +probe_worklet_exit(struct task_struct *wq_thread, void *work)
>  {
>        int cpu = cpumask_first(&wq_thread->cpus_allowed);
>        struct cpu_workqueue_stats *node;
> @@ -504,17 +504,17 @@
>        if (ret)
>                goto out_worklet_enqueue;
>
> -       ret = register_trace_worklet_execute(probe_worklet_execute);
> +       ret = register_trace_worklet_entry(probe_worklet_entry);
>        if (ret)
>                goto out_worklet_enqueue_delayed;
>
> -       ret = register_trace_worklet_complete(probe_worklet_complete);
> +       ret = register_trace_worklet_exit(probe_worklet_exit);
>        if (ret)
> -               goto out_worklet_execute;
> +               goto out_worklet_entry;
>
>        ret = register_trace_workqueue_creation(probe_workqueue_creation);
>        if (ret)
> -               goto out_worklet_complete;
> +               goto out_worklet_exit;
>
>        ret = register_trace_workqueue_destruction(probe_workqueue_destruction);
>        if (ret)
> @@ -529,10 +529,10 @@
>
>  out_workqueue_creation:
>        unregister_trace_workqueue_creation(probe_workqueue_creation);
> -out_worklet_complete:
> -       unregister_trace_worklet_complete(probe_worklet_complete);
> -out_worklet_execute:
> -       unregister_trace_worklet_execute(probe_worklet_execute);
> +out_worklet_exit:
> +       unregister_trace_worklet_exit(probe_worklet_exit);
> +out_worklet_entry:
> +       unregister_trace_worklet_entry(probe_worklet_entry);
>  out_worklet_enqueue_delayed:
>        unregister_trace_worklet_enqueue_delayed(probe_worklet_enqueue_delayed);
>  out_worklet_enqueue:
> Index: linux-2.6-master/kernel/workqueue.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-master.orig/kernel/workqueue.c    2009-05-26 12:43:59.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6-master/kernel/workqueue.c 2009-05-26 12:44:01.000000000 +1000
> @@ -296,9 +296,9 @@
>                work_clear_pending(work);
>                lock_map_acquire(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
>                lock_map_acquire(&lockdep_map);
> -               trace_worklet_execute(cwq->thread, work);
> +               trace_worklet_entry(cwq->thread, work);
>                f(work);
> -               trace_worklet_complete(cwq->thread, work);
> +               trace_worklet_exit(cwq->thread, work);
>                lock_map_release(&lockdep_map);
>                lock_map_release(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map);
>
> Index: linux-2.6-master/Documentation/trace/workqueue.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-master.orig/Documentation/trace/workqueue.txt     2009-05-26 12:44:44.000000000 +1000
> +++ linux-2.6-master/Documentation/trace/workqueue.txt  2009-05-26 12:45:05.000000000 +1000
> @@ -98,8 +98,8 @@
>  # mount -t debugfs debug /sys/kernel/debug/
>  # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/events/workqueue
>  # ls
> -filter          worklet_complete  worklet_enqueue_delayed  workqueue_creation     workqueue_flush
> -worklet_cancel  worklet_enqueue   worklet_execute          workqueue_destruction
> +filter          worklet_exit  worklet_enqueue_delayed  workqueue_creation     workqueue_flush
> +worklet_cancel  worklet_enqueue   worklet_entry          workqueue_destruction
>  # for e in $(ls); do echo 1 > $e/enable; done
>  # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace
>
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@
>  #   | |       |          |         |
>
>  <...>-5627  [000]  4597.858645: worklet_enqueue: thread=ata/0:508 func=ata_pio_task+0x0/0x280 cpu=0
> -<...>-508   [000]  4597.858660: worklet_execute: thread=ata/0:508 work=ffff88007e9e67b8 func=ata_pio_task+0x0/0x280
> -<...>-508   [000]  4597.858684: worklet_complete: thread=ata/0:508 work=ffff88007e9e67b8
> +<...>-508   [000]  4597.858660: worklet_entry: thread=ata/0:508 work=ffff88007e9e67b8 func=ata_pio_task+0x0/0x280
> +<...>-508   [000]  4597.858684: worklet_exit: thread=ata/0:508 work=ffff88007e9e67b8
>  <...>-2437  [000]  4597.861259: worklet_cancel: func=ata_pio_task+0x0/0x280
>  [...]
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-29 15:21    [W:0.082 / U:3.384 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site