Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 29 May 2009 14:05:15 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 0/12 v2] ptrace: introduce task_struct->ptrace_cxt |
| |
On 05/28, Roland McGrath wrote: > > 5/12 still needs a comment about its assumption that tracehook_init_task() > allocated the struct iff appropriate.
Not sure I understand... Where should I put this comment?
> Some log entries (or maybe comments) > I saw said "->pt_*" though that is not the name of the field in the patch.
Yes, the changelog for 9/12.
> Other than the task_lock/kfree nit in 4/12 it all looks good to me so far.
OK, will redo and resend. Perhaps I should send this series to you privately? I don't like to flood lkml again, the changes are cosmetic.
Oleg.
| |