[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/12 v2] ptrace: introduce task_struct->ptrace_cxt
On 05/28, Roland McGrath wrote:
> 5/12 still needs a comment about its assumption that tracehook_init_task()
> allocated the struct iff appropriate.

Not sure I understand... Where should I put this comment?

> Some log entries (or maybe comments)
> I saw said "->pt_*" though that is not the name of the field in the patch.

Yes, the changelog for 9/12.

> Other than the task_lock/kfree nit in 4/12 it all looks good to me so far.

OK, will redo and resend. Perhaps I should send this series to you
privately? I don't like to flood lkml again, the changes are cosmetic.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-29 14:13    [W:0.032 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site