Messages in this thread | | | From | Roland McGrath <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 7/X] ptrace: mv task->parent ptrace_task->pt_tracer | Date | Thu, 28 May 2009 12:28:07 -0700 (PDT) |
| |
> Well, SI_USER == 0, so si_code is zero. And SI_USER looks more > consistent to me, because
Ah so.
> > so it's consistent with what collect_signal() produces > > when a signal is posted with OOM for the sigq allocation. > > perhaps it is better to change collect_signal() to set SI_USER ? > Note that __send_signal() user SI_USER, not zero in is_si_special() > case.
Sure, though as you point out it's purely cosmetic.
Thanks, Roland
| |