lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 7/X] ptrace: mv task->parent ptrace_task->pt_tracer
Date
> Well, SI_USER == 0, so si_code is zero. And SI_USER looks more
> consistent to me, because

Ah so.

> > so it's consistent with what collect_signal() produces
> > when a signal is posted with OOM for the sigq allocation.
>
> perhaps it is better to change collect_signal() to set SI_USER ?
> Note that __send_signal() user SI_USER, not zero in is_si_special()
> case.

Sure, though as you point out it's purely cosmetic.


Thanks,
Roland


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-28 21:31    [W:0.054 / U:0.944 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site