lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 18/38] C/R: core stuff
Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@gmail.com):
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 06:44:36PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@gmail.com):
> > > And since you guys showed that just idea of in-kernel checkpointing is not
> > > rejected outright, it doesn't mean that you can drag every single idea too.
> >
> > Can you rephrase here? I have no idea what you mean by 'drag every single
> > idea'
>
> complexity
> +-|------------------------------------------------|----------------------|-->
> hypervisor C/R in-kernel C/R C/R for unpriviledged
> C/R with "leaks"
>
> I personally thought in-kernel C/R will be rejected outright, but it wasn't.
> This in theory doesn't mean other two issues should be accepted.

Note again that leaving c/R unprivileged was suggested (By Arnd)
as a way to keep us on our toes. When it actually goes upstream
I would prefer it be under a new CAP_CHECKPOINT_RESTART capability,
not CAP_SYS_ADMIN.

-serge


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-28 20:15    [W:0.745 / U:0.200 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site