lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [KVM PATCH v2 2/3] kvm: cleanup io_device code
* Gregory Haskins (ghaskins@novell.com) wrote:
> We modernize the io_device code so that we use container_of() instead of
> dev->private, and move the vtable to a separate ops structure
> (theoretically allows better caching for multiple instances of the same
> ops structure)

Looks like a nice cleanup. Couple minor nits.

> +static struct kvm_io_device_ops pit_dev_ops = {
> + .read = pit_ioport_read,
> + .write = pit_ioport_write,
> + .in_range = pit_in_range,
> +};
> +
> +static struct kvm_io_device_ops speaker_dev_ops = {
> + .read = speaker_ioport_read,
> + .write = speaker_ioport_write,
> + .in_range = speaker_in_range,
> +};

kvm_io_device_ops instances could be made const.

> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -2227,7 +2227,7 @@ static struct kvm_io_device *vcpu_find_pervcpu_dev(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>
> if (vcpu->arch.apic) {
> dev = &vcpu->arch.apic->dev;
> - if (dev->in_range(dev, addr, len, is_write))
> + if (dev->ops->in_range(dev, addr, len, is_write))
> return dev;

> --- a/virt/kvm/iodev.h
> +++ b/virt/kvm/iodev.h
> @@ -18,7 +18,9 @@
>
> #include <linux/kvm_types.h>
>
> -struct kvm_io_device {
> +struct kvm_io_device;
> +
> +struct kvm_io_device_ops {
> void (*read)(struct kvm_io_device *this,
> gpa_t addr,
> int len,
> @@ -30,16 +32,25 @@ struct kvm_io_device {
> int (*in_range)(struct kvm_io_device *this, gpa_t addr, int len,
> int is_write);
> void (*destructor)(struct kvm_io_device *this);
> +};
> +
>
> - void *private;
> +struct kvm_io_device {
> + struct kvm_io_device_ops *ops;
> };

Did you plan to extend kvm_io_device struct?

> +static inline void kvm_iodevice_init(struct kvm_io_device *dev,
> + struct kvm_io_device_ops *ops)
> +{
> + dev->ops = ops;
> +}

And similarly, did you have a plan to do more with kvm_iodevice_init()?
Otherwise looking a bit like overkill to me.

> --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> @@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ struct kvm_io_device *kvm_io_bus_find_dev(struct kvm_io_bus *bus,
> for (i = 0; i < bus->dev_count; i++) {
> struct kvm_io_device *pos = bus->devs[i];
>
> - if (pos->in_range(pos, addr, len, is_write))
> + if (kvm_iodevice_inrange(pos, addr, len, is_write))
> return pos;
> }

You converted this to the helper but not vcpu_find_pervcpu_dev() (not
convinced it actually helps readability, but consistency is good). BTW,
while there, s/kvm_iodevice_inrange/kvm_iodevice_in_range/ would be nice.

thanks,
-chris


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-28 07:53    [W:0.255 / U:0.468 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site