[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 11:51:26AM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> True. From a commercial point of view this is a huge problem casued
> by the device tree - custumers who used to oder a BSP from commercial
> service providers (like Robert or me :-) now often find that all they
> need to do is to tweak the device tree to get their system running.
> Lost business. D*mn... [Maybe this explains Robert's reluctance?]

Wolfgang, you know me long enough to realize that this argument is

Talking about business cases, it has turned out to be extremely
difficult to explain customers that the effort for the actual
functionality is only a little percentage of the work necessary to do
the oftree stuff right. The functionality has often worked after a few
hours, and until all oftrees have been solved, it often takes weeks.

In result, this has already led to customers concluding that

- mainline is not worth the effort
- linux is overkill and one should better use cortex-bare-metal

However, that is only our personal observation.

Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-28 12:17    [W:0.292 / U:18.256 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site