Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 May 2009 18:14:44 -0500 | From | "Serge E. Hallyn" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 18/38] C/R: core stuff |
| |
Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@gmail.com): > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 08:16:44AM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > Honestly, I have great respect for your coding abilities. And if 'voices > > from on high' tell us to base upon your code, I'd be fine with that, I > > have no real problems with what I see on yet another cursory look. But > > given the amount of collective time that's been spent developing, reviewing, > > and testing Oren's set, it wouldn't make any sense to just jump. So > > I'd still just like to know how you see this proceeding. > > Yes, please, someone decide on "checkpoint semi-live container" issue.
Well, *I* for one did decide :) I decided that checkpointing a semi-live container will not bother the kernel, and so the user gets to decide by passing a flag into sys_checkpoint() whether he is ok with a checkpoint if the container was semi-live.
BTW - it looks like your ISP is causing your emails to be flagged as spam by several servers? Several people don't seem to be receiving your patchsets.
-serge
| |