lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 16/18] MAINTAINERS - Remove L: from all but "THE REST"
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 22:28 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2009-05-23 at 21:18 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> >> Really?  That makes the assumption that lack of an "L:" tag is
>> >> equivalent to an "L:linux-kernel" tag, which IMNSHO I don't believe is
>> >> true.
>> > Documentation/SubmittingPatches
>> > 6) Select your CC (e-mail carbon copy) list.
>> > Unless you have a reason NOT to do so, CC linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org.
>> Is that actually true in practice?  At least on linuxppc-dev, very few
>> patches are cc'd to lkml.  I don't remember ever being prompted to cc
>> lkml on all patches, and I haven't been prompting others to do so.
>
> Hi Grant.
>
> I think cc:ing lkml should be the default for patches.

Do subsystem maintainers think so? Unless they do (and tell others
so), I don't think it will actually happen. Until that point, I don't
think the L:linux-kernel lines should be removed.

> Having a few selected sections have lkml entries
> might make people think that a section that doesn't
> specifically mention lkml therefore wouldn't need to
> a cc: to lkml.
>
> Perhaps MAINTAINERS should mention that its preface
> as well as having it in Documentation/SubmittingPatches?

--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-24 06:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans