[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH][KVM][retry 4] Add support for Pause Filtering to AMD SVM
Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> This feature creates a new field in the VMCB called Pause
> Filter Count. If Pause Filter Count is greater than 0 and
> intercepting PAUSEs is enabled, the processor will increment
> an internal counter when a PAUSE instruction occurs instead
> of intercepting. When the internal counter reaches the
> Pause Filter Count value, a PAUSE intercept will occur.
> This feature can be used to detect contended spinlocks,
> especially when the lock holding VCPU is not scheduled.
> Rescheduling another VCPU prevents the VCPU seeking the
> lock from wasting its quantum by spinning idly. Perform
> the reschedule by increasing the the credited time on
> the VCPU.
> Experimental results show that most spinlocks are held
> for less than 1000 PAUSE cycles or more than a few
> thousand. Default the Pause Filter Counter to 3000 to
> detect the contended spinlocks.
> Processor support for this feature is indicated by a CPUID
> bit.
> On a 24 core system running 4 guests each with 16 VCPUs,
> this patch improved overall performance of each guest's
> 32 job kernbench by approximately 1%. Further performance
> improvement may be possible with a more sophisticated
> yield algorithm.

Please split this into a scheduler patch and a kvm patch.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-21 10:51    [W:0.115 / U:2.588 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site