[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 01/22] x86: add methods for writing of an MSR on several CPUs
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 07:21:21AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >>>
> >> smp_call_function_many() does allow concurrent execution.
> >
> > Well, IMHO, not an absolutely concurrent execution since you can't
> > control at what moment in time the IPIs will be executed on each core,
> > IOW, the respective call function IPIs will generally not coincide on
> > each core at a given moment in time. This is especially true if you're
> > sending IPIs to cores across nodes.
> >
> > And there's hypothetically a small window where you might get an
> > inconsistent MSR content across cores. It's a whole another question
> > whether this is going to be relevant.
> >
> It *allows* concurrent execution. It doesn't *guarantee* concurrent
> execution.

Exactly what I'm trying to say.

> > So, the actual question is do we need that done in msr.c? If there are
> > no potential users, I could easily do the whole thing in the driver and
> > do not touch x86 code.
> Only if we care about the additional performance of having it be
> nonserializing.

Well, let's do the nonserializing thing and have it done right from the
beginning. We might not care now but who knows..?


Operating | Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
System | Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. München, Germany
Research | Geschäftsführer: Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Center | Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis München
(OSRC) | Registergericht München, HRB Nr. 43632

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-21 18:31    [W:0.099 / U:0.976 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site