lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/11] Per-bdi writeback flusher threads #4
From
Date
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 08:20 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, May 19 2009, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 14:19 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > This is the fourth version of this patchset. Chances since v3:
> > >
> > > - Dropped a prep patch, it has been included in mainline since.
> > >
> > > - Add a work-to-do list to the bdi. This is struct bdi_work. Each
> > > wb thread will notice and execute work on bdi->work_list. The arguments
> > > are which sb (or NULL for all) to flush and how many pages to flush.
> > >
> > > - Fix a bug where not all bdi's would end up on the bdi_list, so potentially
> > > some data would not be flushed.
> > >
> > > - Make wb_kupdated() pass on wbc->older_than_this so we maintain the same
> > > behaviour for kupdated flushes.
> > >
> > > - Have the wb thread flush first before sleeping, to avoid losing the
> > > first flush on lazy register.
> > >
> > > - Rebase to newer kernels.

> I'm attaching two patches - apply #1 to -rc6, and then #2 is a roll-up
> of the patch series that you can apply next.
Jens,

I run into 2 issues with kernel 2.6.30-rc6+BDI_Flusher_V4. Below is one.

Tue May 19 00:00:00 CST 2009
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000001d8
IP: [<ffffffff803f3c4c>] generic_make_request+0x10a/0x384
PGD 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
last sysfs file: /sys/block/sdb/stat
CPU 0
Modules linked in: igb
Pid: 1445, comm: bdi-8:16 Not tainted 2.6.30-rc6-bdiflusherv4 #1 X8DTN
RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff803f3c4c>] [<ffffffff803f3c4c>] generic_make_request+0x10a/0x384
RSP: 0018:ffff8800bd04da60 EFLAGS: 00010206
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff8801be45d500 RCX: 00000000038a0df8
RDX: 0000000000000008 RSI: 0000000000000576 RDI: ffff8801bf408680
RBP: ffff8801be45d500 R08: ffffe20001ee8140 R09: ffff8800bd04da98
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8800bd72eb40 R12: ffff8801be45d500
R13: ffff88005f51f310 R14: 0000000000000008 R15: ffff8800b15a5458
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffc20000000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
CR2: 00000000000001d8 CR3: 0000000000201000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Process bdi-8:16 (pid: 1445, threadinfo ffff8800bd04c000, task ffff8800bd1b75f0)
Stack:
0000000000000008 ffffffff8027a613 00000000848dc000 ffffffffffffffff
ffff8800a8190f50 ffffffff00000012 ffff8800a81938e0 ffffc2000000001b
0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffe200026f9c30 0000000000000000
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8027a613>] ? mempool_alloc+0x59/0x10f
[<ffffffff803f3f70>] ? submit_bio+0xaa/0xb1
[<ffffffff802c6a3f>] ? submit_bh+0xe3/0x103
[<ffffffff802c92ea>] ? __block_write_full_page+0x1fb/0x2f2
[<ffffffff802c7d6a>] ? end_buffer_async_write+0x0/0xfb
[<ffffffff8027e8d2>] ? __writepage+0xa/0x25
[<ffffffff8027f036>] ? write_cache_pages+0x21c/0x338
[<ffffffff8027e8c8>] ? __writepage+0x0/0x25
[<ffffffff8027f195>] ? do_writepages+0x27/0x2d
[<ffffffff802c22c1>] ? __writeback_single_inode+0x159/0x2b3
[<ffffffff8071e52a>] ? thread_return+0x3e/0xaa
[<ffffffff8027f267>] ? determine_dirtyable_memory+0xd/0x1d
[<ffffffff8027f2dd>] ? get_dirty_limits+0x1d/0x255
[<ffffffff802c27bc>] ? generic_sync_wb_inodes+0x1b4/0x220
[<ffffffff802c3130>] ? wb_do_writeback+0x16c/0x215
[<ffffffff802c323e>] ? bdi_writeback_task+0x65/0x10d
[<ffffffff8024cc06>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
[<ffffffff8024cb27>] ? bit_waitqueue+0x10/0xa0
[<ffffffff80289257>] ? bdi_start_fn+0x0/0xba
[<ffffffff802892c6>] ? bdi_start_fn+0x6f/0xba
[<ffffffff8024c860>] ? kthread+0x54/0x80
[<ffffffff8020c97a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[<ffffffff8024c80c>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80
[<ffffffff8020c970>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
The panic happened at the beginging of a mmap randrw after a mmap randwrite.

It's triggered in __generic_make_request => bdev_get_queue(bio->bi_bdev),
because bio->bi_bdev->bd_disk is equal to NULL.

The callchain is:
bdi_writeback_task =>
wb_do_writeback =>
generic_sync_wb_inodes =>
__writeback_single_inode =>
...
__block_write_full_page =>
submit_bh =>
submit_bio=>
generic_make_request

yanmin


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-20 09:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans