lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Explicitly disable BT radio using rfkill interface on suspend
    Hi Alan:

    Alan Stern wrote:
    > On Wed, 20 May 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote:
    >
    >
    >
    > That's okay. Inelegant, perhaps, but workable. Besides, as we see
    > below, the new rule would have to do more than the old rule.
    >
    >
    I agree this is a rather inelegant solution. A new rule would have to
    be added to hid2hci then. It's much more preferable to be able to fix
    kernel space from mucking up the device. Is there a way to mark a
    device to /not/ run reset-resume after S3?
    >
    > Does that create the same removal event? If it does then you wouldd be
    > in an unfortunate state. The script would have to check somehow
    > whether the removal was deliberate or spontaneous.
    >
    Yes it does create the same removal event when you switch to HID mode.
    I don't know of any way that you can calculate if the switch was
    intentional.


    --
    Mario Limonciello
    *Dell | Linux Engineering*
    mario_limonciello@dell.com

    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-05-20 19:55    [W:4.492 / U:0.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site