Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Wed, 20 May 2009 10:42:59 -0700 | From | Fenghua Yu <> | Subject | [PATCH] Time out for possible dead loops during queued invalidation wait |
| |
Two loops in qi_submit_sync() do not have time out. If hardware can not finish the queued invalidation for some reason, the loops could end up in dead loops without any hint for what is going on. I add time out for the loops and report warning when time out happens.
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
---
dmar.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/dmar.c b/drivers/pci/dmar.c index fa3a113..95baacd 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/dmar.c +++ b/drivers/pci/dmar.c @@ -637,6 +637,7 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct qi_desc *desc, struct intel_iommu *iommu) struct qi_desc *hw, wait_desc; int wait_index, index; unsigned long flags; + cycles_t start_time; if (!qi) return 0; @@ -644,8 +645,13 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct qi_desc *desc, struct intel_iommu *iommu) hw = qi->desc; spin_lock_irqsave(&qi->q_lock, flags); + start_time = get_cycles(); while (qi->free_cnt < 3) { spin_unlock_irqrestore(&qi->q_lock, flags); + if (DMAR_OPERATION_TIMEOUT < (get_cycles() - start_time)) { + WARN(1, "No space in invalidation queue.\n"); + return -ENOSPC; + } cpu_relax(); spin_lock_irqsave(&qi->q_lock, flags); } @@ -675,6 +681,7 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct qi_desc *desc, struct intel_iommu *iommu) */ writel(qi->free_head << 4, iommu->reg + DMAR_IQT_REG); + start_time = get_cycles(); while (qi->desc_status[wait_index] != QI_DONE) { /* * We will leave the interrupts disabled, to prevent interrupt @@ -687,6 +694,11 @@ int qi_submit_sync(struct qi_desc *desc, struct intel_iommu *iommu) if (rc) goto out; + if (DMAR_OPERATION_TIMEOUT < (get_cycles() - start_time)) { + WARN(1, "Queued invalidation can not complete.\n"); + goto out; + } + spin_unlock(&qi->q_lock); cpu_relax(); spin_lock(&qi->q_lock);
| |