[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 21/32] union-mount: Make lookup work for union-mounted file systems
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 06:15:52PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2009, Jan Blunck wrote:
> > On union-mounted file systems the lookup function must also visit lower layers
> > of the union-stack when doing a lookup. This patches add support for
> > union-mounts to cached lookups and real lookups.
> >
> > We have 3 different styles of lookup functions now:
> > - multiple pathname components, follow mounts, follow union, follow symlinks
> > - single pathname component, doesn't follow mounts, follow union, doesn't
> > follow symlinks
> > - single pathname component doesn't follow mounts, doesn't follow unions,
> > doesn't follow symlinks
> Ugh... I do wonder if this could be done in a less complicated way,
> there does seem to be a fair amount of duplication between these
> functions.

Yeah, I agree. My best idea so far is not very good - have one
skeleton function and pass in function pointers for the
lookup_topmost() and build_union() functions. Do you have any ideas?

> Worse, it looks like there are still i_mutex lock ordering issues
> (__hash_lookup_topmost()/__hash_lookup_build_union()). What happens
> if two separate unions of two filesystems are built where the order of
> branches is reversed?

We have a similar problem in union_copyup_dir(). Hm, thinking about
this, only one of the file systems can actually change while we are
doing work. That might help us get out of the lock ordering problems.


 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-19 19:35    [W:0.125 / U:1.152 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site