lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/4] zone_reclaim_mode is always 0 by default
Date
Hi

> > Current linux policy is, zone_reclaim_mode is enabled by default if the machine
> > has large remote node distance. it's because we could assume that large distance
> > mean large server until recently.
> >
> > Unfortunately, recent modern x86 CPU (e.g. Core i7, Opeteron) have P2P transport
> > memory controller. IOW it's seen as NUMA from software view.
> >
> > Some Core i7 machine has large remote node distance, but zone_reclaim don't
> > fit desktop and small file server. it cause performance degression.
> >
> > Thus, zone_reclaim == 0 is better by default if the machine is small.
>
> What if I had a node 0 with 32GB or 128GB of memory. In that case,
> we would have 3GB for DMA32, 125GB for Normal and then a node 1 with
> 128GB. I would suggest that zone reclaim would perform normally and
> be beneficial.
>
> You are unfairly classifying this as a size of machine problem when it is
> really a problem with the underlying zone reclaim code being triggered
> due to imbalanced node/zones, part of which is due to a single node
> having multiple zones and those multiple zones setting up the conditions
> for extremely agressive reclaim. In other words, you are putting a
> bandage in place to hide a problem on your particular hardware.
>
> Can RECLAIM_DISTANCE be adjusted so your Ci7 boxes are no longer caught?
> Aren't 4 node Ci7 boxes soon to be readily available? How are your apps
> different from my apps in that you are not impacted by node locality?
> Are you being too insensitive to node locality? Conversely am I being
> too sensitive?
>
> All that said, I would not stop this from going in. I just think the
> selection criteria is rather random. I think we know the condition we
> are trying to avoid which is a small Normal zone on one node and a larger
> Normal zone on another causing zone reclaim to be overly agressive.
> I don't know how to quantify "small" versus "large". I would suggest
> that a node 0 with 16 or more GB should have zone reclaim on by default
> as well. Can that be expressed in the selection criteria.

I post my opinion as another mail. please see it.









\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-19 04:57    [W:0.090 / U:0.620 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site