lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

    * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote:

    > On 05/17, Ingo Molnar wrote:
    > >
    > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13107
    > > > Subject : LTP 20080131 causes defunct processes w/2.6.30-rc1
    > > > Submitter : Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
    > > > Date : 2009-04-09 15:43 (38 days old)
    > > > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=b3bfa0cba867f23365b81658b47efd906830879b
    > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123929187208953&w=4
    > > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/4/10/193
    > > > Handled-By : Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
    > >
    > > Oleg says in that thread that it's as-designed, and followup
    > > questions were not replied to (yet).
    >
    > Yes, I think this is false alarm. Perhaps I missed something, and
    > I am waiting for more info from Kumar, but it looks like ltp was
    > already changed to skip the "{ PTRACE_ATTACH, 1, EPERM }" test on
    > kernels after 2.6.25

    Btw., why did the patch (and the revert) make any difference to the
    test? Timing differences look improbable.

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2009-05-18 17:17    [W:0.040 / U:29.412 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site