lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2009]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Oops in usb-serial with keyspan adapter on current upstream
On Mon, 18 May 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> Hi folks !
>
> Current kernels give the oops below at boot with my Keyspan plugged,
> used to work fine on 2.6.28 at least.

Does your test kernel include commit
2d93148ab6988cad872e65d694c95e8944e1b626?

> It looks to me like some kind of race between the disconnection after
> the FW load and the re-connect but I'm not sure.

I don't think that's quite right. Your trace shows the oops occurred
during the disconnect processing, which means the re-connect had not
yet started.

> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
> usbcore: registered new interface driver usbserial
> USB Serial support registered for generic
> usbcore: registered new interface driver usbserial_generic
> usbserial: USB Serial Driver core
> USB Serial support registered for Keyspan - (without firmware)
> USB Serial support registered for Keyspan 1 port adapter
> USB Serial support registered for Keyspan 2 port adapter
> USB Serial support registered for Keyspan 4 port adapter
> keyspan 2-1:1.0: Keyspan - (without firmware) converter detected
> usb 2-1: firmware: using built-in firmware keyspan/usa49w.fw
> usb 2-1: USB disconnect, address 2
> usbcore: registered new interface driver keyspan
> keyspan: v1.1.5:Keyspan USB to Serial Converter Driver
> Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x00000010
> Faulting instruction address: 0xc0000000002da15c
> Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
> SMP NR_CPUS=4 PowerMac
> Modules linked in: snd_seq_midi snd_rawmidi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_timer snd_seq_device snd keyspan uninorth_agp usbserial agpgart soundcore
> NIP: c0000000002da15c LR: c0000000002d3760 CTR: c0000000002d35ec
> REGS: c00000017a4cb4c0 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (2.6.30-rc6-00037-g8646010-dirty)
> MSR: 9000000000009032 <EE,ME,IR,DR> CR: 24000024 XER: 200fffff
> DAR: 0000000000000010, DSISR: 0000000040000000
> TASK = c00000017a4890e0[191] 'khubd' THREAD: c00000017a4c8000 CPU: 2
> GPR00: c000000000755f30 c00000017a4cb740 c000000000783d48 0000000000000001
> GPR04: 0000000000000000 c0000001783fba90 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
> GPR08: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c0000000002d35ec
> GPR12: 0000000024000082 c0000000007b5680 0000000000000002 c0000001781c0a30
> GPR16: 00000000000003e8 0000000000000000 c0000001781fd000 c0000001781c0a30
> GPR20: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 c0000001781fd800 0000000000000001
> GPR24: c00000017a41a600 c0000001789ab480 c0000001783fb998 0000000000000000
> GPR28: 0000000000000000 c00000017a4cb7b0 c00000000070f8d0 0000000000000000
> NIP [c0000000002da15c] .release_nodes+0x54/0x254
> LR [c0000000002d3760] .device_del+0x174/0x1e8
> Call Trace:
> [c00000017a4cb740] [c00000017a4cb880] 0xc00000017a4cb880 (unreliable)
> [c00000017a4cb7f0] [c0000000002d3760] .device_del+0x174/0x1e8

Is it possible to pin this down to a single bad data access or
instruction?

Alan Stern



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2009-05-18 17:09    [W:0.322 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site